THE "EVIL" BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY

As all fair-minded people should, I try to keep an open mind about politics as well as taking an interest in them as is the duty of all who are qualified to vote.   My wife and I voted in the last local elections here in Spain.   

In the UK, there is a legally registered political party called the British National Party, or BNP in short.  Vilified as "fascists and racists" by the other parties, some of whom have seen their representatives sidelined by the BNP ones in recent local elections, I read about what they do and who they are on their web-site just as I read the Labour and Conservatives as well.  I occasionally even read the Liberal Party's site.

The item reproduced below has particular interest as it shows the silly attitudes that have been allowed to develope in the UK, where.... Well, please read the item and form your own opinions.   Mine are that I wonder sometimes if a sizeable portion of the British public is determined to commit suicide: certainly intent on not leaving a better country for our grandchildren judging by their inactivity to protest about the evil in our midst.  You judge who is really evil.

The BNP's web site is at:   www.bnp.org.uk.

Read more about the:

The TOGO Football Team attack in Angola, January 2010.

Two Minutes Versus Three Weeks: How Long DOES IT TAKE the Crown Prosecution Service to Retry?

1.THE Leaders oF THE BNP FOR EXERCISING THEIR RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

Answer: Two minutes. 

2. OR Muslim Terrorists FOR THREATENING TO MURDER BRITISH PEOPLE WITH BOMBS?

Answer: Two weeks?

 
The most remarkable thing about yesterday’s verdict in yet another Islamist terrorist court case was the fact that the Crown Prosecution Service has three weeks to decide whether the men should face retrials on the counts on which the jury was hung.

This contrasts vividly with the decision to retry the leader of the BNP, Nick Griffin, and colleague Mark Collett, during the ‘Free Speech Trial’ in 2006. At that trial — where the BNP ‘crime’ was a speech, not a bombing campaign — it took the CPS exactly two minutes to announce that it would be seeking a retrial after the jury was hung.

Yesterday, however, somehow there was no instant announcement in the Islamist terrorist case, and the CPS said “the prosecution is considering a request for a retrial” with regard to the accusations that jet aircraft were to be intended targets.

So: When patriotic Brits are put on trial for warning about Islamist terrorists, they are instantly prosecuted and re-prosecuted if the jury is hung; but when Islamist terrorists are put on trial for aiming to murder thousands, the CPS goes away and thinks about re-prosecution. 

Justice for native Britons? We don’t think so.

Consider the gravity of the charges against the Islamists, and then compare them to the ‘crime’ of giving a speech:

Jurors found that the Islamists were members of an east London al Qaeda-inspired terror cell that planned to detonate home-made bombs in attacks on British targets including Heathrow airport.

Following a five-month trial the jury failed to reach verdicts on prosecution claims that they were plotting an unprecedented series of suicide bombings on transatlantic airliners.

The three — Abdulla Ahmed Ali, 27, Assad Sarwar, 28, and Tanvir Hussain, 27 — had admitted planning small-scale bomb attacks, but jurors rejected their claims that they did not plan to kill or hurt anyone in the blasts.

The jury could not agree verdicts on whether another four Muslim men — Ibrahim Savant, 27, Arafat Waheed Khan, 27, Waheed Zaman, 24, and Umar Islam, 30 — were also involved in the conspiracy to murder.   All seven defendants earlier admitted conspiring to cause a public nuisance by distributing al Qaeda-style videos threatening suicide attacks in Britain.

Jurors found that the mastermind Ali (an oxymoron in this case?), along with Sarwar and Hussain, intended to murder people using an ingenious form of hydrogen peroxide liquid bomb disguised as a soft drink.    Prosecutors said his gang considered national infrastructure targets including gas terminals and oil refineries.

Evidence revealed that Canary Wharf, the Bacton gas terminal pipeline, various airports, the electricity grid and internet providers were studied.    Documents also referred to Coryton Oil Refinery, in south Essex, and Fawley Oil Refinery, in Hampshire, and Kingsbury Oil Refinery in Warwickshire.

Police said the plot was drawn up in Pakistan with detailed instructions passed to Ali during frequent trips to its lawless border with Afghanistan. They believe a mystery al Qaeda bomb-maker is responsible for the ingenious liquid bomb design concealed within 500 ml Oasis or Lucozade bottles.

Surveillance teams watched Ali on his return to Britain as he assembled his terror cell, gathered materials and identified targets. Undercover officers looked on as the unemployed former shop worker used cash to purchase a £138,000 second-floor flat in Forest Road, Walthamstow.

They planted a secret bug that revealed it was converted into a bomb factory where Ali met the others to construct the bombs. The flat was also used as a location for Ali and his cell to record suicide videos threatening further attacks against the West.   In his video Ali warned the British public to expect “floods of martyr operations” that would leave body parts scattered in the streets.

Ali was watched as he used public phone-boxes, mobile-phones and anonymous email accounts to keep in touch with mystery terrorist godfathers in Pakistan.

On his arrest, he was found carrying an elaborate and damning blueprint for the plot scrawled in a battered pocket diary. Airport security arrangements and details of flights, including the seven highlighted services, were discovered on a computer memory stick in another pocket.

But the jurors could not agree on verdicts on the prosecution’s evidence that Ali intended to target passenger jets flying from London to major North American cities with suicide attacks.

By way of contrast, what was the crime for which the BNP leader was put on trial?  Giving a speech which warned that home-grown Islamist terrorists would soon strike in Britain.

_______________________________________________________________

Brian Deller's notes.

My personal opinion is that too many of the British populace have fallen victim to the media vilification of the BNP without being intelligent enough to at least take a look at their policies and MAKING UP THEIR OWN MINDS.  This is not unusual in a society where far too many, especially the young, are brainwashed to worship and emulate drug or alcohol (or both) addled "celebrities" whose only contribution to society is to wear clothes (Kate Moss, etc) or sing a song (Amy Winehouse, etc) or take part in reality TV shows (Jade Goody et al).   The old standards that made Britain great have been gradually wiped out by the politically correct tools who have done such terrible acts as to denigrate British history which ensured that the English language is the most internationally spoken method of communication in the world and admired still by many Third World countries so much, they all want to go and live in Britain.   For many though that admiration is so great that they have perceived the weaknesses and the open current British amorality and are making plans to take Britain over in the future.   That amorality includes a move away form good religions to binge drinking, murder in the streets (25 teenagers stabbed to death in public in London alone this year to date) even of people trying to stop feral youths damaging their property outside their won homes.   What has happened to the old British "bulldog" spirit?   It would appear to be being awakened in the ranks of the BNP.

There are many who say that the West's Christian or Jewish religions are hogwash, but they have until recent years set the standards that made Britain a great place to live.  That is until the amoral amongst us set up the propaganda to destroy them and what they represent in their quest to control the masses. 

Remember the Ten Commandments.  They have worked for thousands of years in just societies.

Remember that the BBC used some of your TV licence money to prosecute the BNP leaders in the where the two BNP leaders were found not guilty even at a second trial, as they should have been, and clear the prejudices that may have been put in your minds by the media and then form your own opinions about the objectives of the BNP.     Especially after reading this item above.

When will the British wake up and reject blatantly false propaganda?   Do the "common folk" have the ability to do so?   Or do they believe everything they are told by people whose main aim is to control the populace?

I will leave you to answer those questions after you have studied the facts with an open mind.