The voice, gentle but clear, has a mesmeric quality to it and as he
recites verses of the Koran in Arabic they gain a hypnotic, captivating
beauty.
Then Riyadh ul Haq translates the words into English and delivers his
own interpretation of the holy text, and what sounded so lyrical becomes a
stark manifesto of separationist loathing.
His target is the kuffar, the nonMuslim, whether Jewish, Christian,
Hindu or atheist, and the message is simple: their designs are evil, their
ways corrupting. Stay away from them.
Mr ul Haq, 36, who is charismatic, intelligent and British, seems to
share Osama bin Laden’s stated conviction that America and its allies are
seeking to destroy Islam. Both men regard this as the fulfilment of a
prophecy made by the Prophet Muhammad, and both find justification in the
Koran for the use of militant jihad to attack and kill those nonbelievers
who have incurred Allah’s displeasure.
Each preaches the glories of martyrdom, yet
while bin Laden hides somewhere near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, Mr
ul Haq lives in Leicester and is fêted internationally as a leading
scholar of Islam. His views would be cause enough for concern were he
merely a maverick cleric with a small group of followers whose austere,
rejectionist agenda was isolated from mainstream Islamic thought.
When Mr ul Haq speaks of his contempt for
British ways and Western values, however, it carries the authority of the
ultra-conservative Islamic movement whose views are preached in hundreds
of mosques and madrassas in Britain. The Deobandis run more than 600 of
the 1,300 mosques in Britain and their seminaries – known as darul uloom –
produce the vast majority of British-trained Islamic clerics.
Walk into a British mosque, particularly
outside London, and the chances are that it is the voice of Deoband that
you will hear.
Sheikh Abu Yusuf Riyadh ul Haq, to give him
his full title, travels the world to speak and lecture, often to audiences
of young people, and his books and sermons are sold widely.
Many can be downloaded from the internet.
Most offer guidance on the practice and beliefs of Islam. They carry no
overt political agenda and are said to display an impressive range and
depth of scholarship. Mr ul Haq displays a deep love and respect for his
fellow Muslims. It is when he chooses to talk about nonMuslims – and
offers his analysis of world events – that the anger erupts.
To feel outrage at the global suffering of
innocents in Muslim countries is not, of course, the preserve of any
particular Islamic movement. The sense of injustice is shared by many
nonMuslims. For Mr ul Haq, however, the narrative that leads from Bosnia,
Chechnya and Kashmir to Iraq, Afghanistan and Israel-West Bank carries an
apocalyptic theme.
His message is that although Allah created
his religion to reign supreme, Muhammad cautioned that a time would come
when “different nations will invite one another against you, just as
people seated around a platter of food invite one another to consume that
food”.
And so it has come to pass. The demonic
powers of the West have joined together in a concerted, potentially
genocidal mission to humiliate, murder, rape and pillage Muslim lands and
people. Their target is Islam.
Muslims have become weak because they have
developed “the love of life and the dislike of death”. Their faith is
being tested and for Islam to prevail the believer must be willing, even
eager, to sacrifice his life “in the way of Allah”. Muslims are living in
that era “before the day of reckoning” when, as prophesied, “the truthful
will be rejected and the liar will be believed”. In this time of darkness,
“adhering to the fundamentals of Islam . . . is considered extremism and
the struggle against oppression is called terrorism”.
“Nobody should be able to tell us what
moderation is and what extremism is. One man’s poison is another man’s
medicine,” he said in a sermon last year.
In one talk, Mr ul Haq tells British Muslims
that he is “not suggesting that we should rise here – I’m sure we are all
sensible enough to know that”. He also pledges that “we will not endanger
the life of any innocent person”.
A sermon about Israel, however, prompts cries
of “Allahu akbar!” [God is greater] from the congregation when Mr ul Haq
calls on them to “be willing to sacrifice anything that may be required of
us”. The al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem must be liberated and “we are willing
to die in the process”. When called upon, “we will consider it an honour
and a privilege to shed our blood”. Ultimately, Allah has promised that
Islam will “prevail over all other religions, even though the disbelivers
may dislike it”. Mr ul Haq says: “Do not despair. Victory is ours. It’s
just a question of time.”
There is no room in this narrative for any
criticism of those Muslims who murder fellow Muslims, nor of those Muslim
governments that persecute and terrorise their nonMuslim minorities.
When he is not urging British Muslims to seek
martyrdom in Muslim lands, Mr ul Haq finds time to caution them of the
grave danger to their faith that is posed by living and working in the
kuffar West. The Koran teaches Muslims not to follow in the footsteps of
the Jews and the Christians, yet “of our own conscious choice we decide to
live, act, work, behave, enjoy and play just like the kuffar”.
“Do not befriend the kuffar” was Allah’s
warning to Muslims, and Muhammad instructed his companions “to distance
themselves and fear this alignment with the kuffarin every way, even to
the manner of dressing”.
For Mr ul Haq, everything that a Muslim does
– the way he eats food, the clothes he wears, the way he parts his hair,
the length of his beard – should emphasise his separateness from the
nonMuslim. The Muslim should not raise his hand to greet a fellow Muslim
because that is how Christians greet each other. He should not offer
applause as a sign of approval or appreciation – clapping is a pagan
practice.
And he should not celebrate “anyone’s
birthday, Father’s Day, Mother’s Day” or the new year. “Categorically, the
Prophet forbade the celebration of the new year.”
The nightmare prospect for Islam in Britain
is that Muslims will be influenced by these ways and habits – “this
culture, this evil influence” – of the kuffar. Muslims should beware,
because “the Jews and the Christians will never be pleased with you until
you follow their way . . . completely, in everything”.
Mr ul Haq was 3 when he came to Britain and
13 when he became a student at the first and most influential of Britain’s
Deobandi seminaries, which opened in 1975 in a converted sanatorium in the
rural hills above Bury, Greater Manchester.
For six years he studied at the feet of Yusuf
Motala, a man described by one admirer as “the Pope” of Britain’s
Deobandis, and he now runs an Islamic academy with branches in Leicester
and Birmingham. Mr ul Haq is so highly regarded within Deobandi circles,
The Timeshas learnt, that he is thought likely to succeed his spiritual
mentor as the head of the Bury seminary.
Islam has no hierarchical structure. Each
mosque is autonomous and the Deobandis have no official leader, but the
Bury seminary is so powerful that the man who runs it is held to be the
most influential Deobandi in the country.
Mr ul Haq’s status appears unaffected by an
encounter with West Midlands police in 2003, when he was employed as the
imam at Birmingham Central Mosque. He left the post after being arrested
and questioned – but not charged – during a murder inquiry sparked by a
fatal shooting in the city.
The killing followed a feud between rival
factions at the mosque, whose younger, more militant members were said to
be devoted to Mr ul Haq. A subsequent court case heard that tensions
exploded after the decision by the imam to marry, in secret, a second
wife. Further embarrassment came when he was forced to cancel a visit to
Canada last summer after concerns were raised that his speeches promoted
hatred of Jews, Hindus and gay people.
Yet in Britain, Mr ul Haq’s stock remains
high. In January last year he was chosen to be the guest of honour at a
Whitehall reception to mark Eid ul-Fitr, the Islamic holiday. The
invitation, described by officials as “an unfortunate oversight”, was
later withdrawn and has never been explained.
The
sermons. Extracts from the preachings of Riyadh ul-Haq
On Jews “They’re all the same. The
Jews don’t have to be in Israel to be like this. It doesn’t matter whether
they’re in New York, Houston, St Louis, London, Birmingham, Bradford,
Manchester. They’re all the same. They’ve monopolised everything: the
Holocaust, God, money, interest, usury, the world economy, the media,
political institutions . . . they monopolised tyranny and oppression as
well. And injustice”
On New York “Jew York . . . sorry, New
York . . . a slip of the tongue.”
On the Taleban “The only group of
people upon the earth who are establishing the Sharia and the law of
Allah” [In 2000]
“What crime has the Government of Afghanistan
committed? All they have done is they have refused to hand over a person
(Osama bin Laden) whose guilt is yet to be proven. Because of that crime,
the entire nation is being punished. And as a result, because they strive
to represent Islam, the whole of Islam is being demonised. And as a
result, Muslims all over the globe are being discriminated against” [In
late 2001]
On Europe “Europe has made it clear:
they will not tolerate a Muslim force or power in Europe. And if it means
massacring Muslims, if it means genocide, if it means a holocaust in
Europe again, so be it. For this time, the target is Muslims”
On Muslims in Britain “It’s become
insane that as Muslims in this country we are more concerned about the
frequency of our bins being emptied than we are about Muslim women being
raped, children being massacred, old men being put to death and buried
alive, and entire populations being subjugated and being made victims of
genocide in other parts of the world”.
On Britain’s anti-terror laws “Muslims
are being maligned, our religious ideals and values . . . are under threat
and it is naive to suggest otherwise. Read between the lines, peer beyond
the spin. Laws are being introduced which . . . are targeted at Muslims.
We are being discriminated against. Muslims in this country are being
picked up one by one, control orders, imprisonment without trial,
imprisonment on the flimsiest of excuses”
On integration “Allah has warned us in
the Koran, do not befriend the kuffar [unbelievers], do not align
yourselves with the kuffar”
On the threat faced by British Muslims
“Winston Churchill made a very insightful comment. He said: ‘Appeasement
is the policy of feeding the crocodile in the hope that it will eat you
last’. As Muslims today, we think it’s OK, things can happen to Muslims
elsewhere, but what will happen when there is no one else to devour? We
will be the next meal”
On jihad “The moment we say something,
we are branded fanatics, terrorists, extremists. And no one dare utter the
J-word. The J-word has become taboo. The J-word can never be mentioned and
if someone mentions it even Muslims look at one another. So much is
happening and yet we are expected to remain silent”
On Islam’s ultimate triumph “Allah has
promised. It is he who has sent his Messenger [Muhammad] with the religion
of truth so that it may prevail over all other religions, even though the
disbelievers may dislike it, even though the mushrikin [the idolaters] may
dislike it. Allah has promised that victory will be for the believers. But
we will be tested in the meantime”
On Israel “Oh Allah, do not let us die
until our eyes are cooled with the sight of banu Israel [the children of
Israel] being punished for their crimes”
On sacrifice “Trust in Allah, trust in
the Prophet’s promises and his words. But not just rely on him and sit
back, carrying on with our nine-to-five lives and our rat race. No, but be
willing to sacrifice anything that may be required of us in the way of
Allah”
On culture “Today, the culture of Coke
and the Big Mac, the culture of the Americans, the culture of the
Europeans, these cultures are dominant and they are all pervasive. We
stand in awe of their culture and we are imitating them in everything.
This culture, this evil influence, this imitation of the kuffar . . .”
On opera “In some Muslim countries . .
. they have built opera houses at a cost of hundreds of millions of
pounds. For what and for who? Muslims, Arabs, going to the opera to listen
to a Frenchman singing in Italian? That’s the level to which we have
stooped”
On Christmas “Muslims celebrating
Christmas! It’s amazing. We think that it's innocent. It’s not innocent.
The Christmas Eve masses held in their churches. What do they do? They
take bread and they take wine in a very formal, customary way . . . They
believe they are eating the flesh of Issa [Jesus]. When they drink the
wine, they believe they are consuming the blood of Issa, ie the flesh and
the blood of his sacrifice. Of course, it’s all mumbo-jumbo.”